3–12 day dispatch window due to updated U.S. documentation requirements • All tariff costs covered
Table of Contents
Stubborn fat deposits that don’t go away are a common issue many people face on their fat loss journey. All because, generally, our bodies maintain the same number of adipocytes (fat cells) throughout life, meaning even though the numbers on the scale decrease, the number of fat cells remains the same. This explains stubborn fat pockets that persist despite all the lifestyle changes.
This explains the rising demand for non-surgical fat-reduction procedures, particularly targeted fat-reduction procedures that destroy fat cells directly, with minimal downtime and rapid results. Today, we would like to discuss two popular options in the cosmetic beauty sphere: Aqualyx and Kybella. While these brands share similar goals, their working principles and target areas vary, and understanding these differences is important for planning a well-performing cosmetic treatment. Follow along to learn all the essentials gathered by the FillerCloud’s team of professionals!
Before discussing both differences and similarities, let’s introduce the two brands and give an understandable definition to them both:
With the basics already memorized and understood, we can now discuss the similarities and differences in the product’s main features, which will help you determine the best choice for each patient and their aesthetic goals.
Both Kybella and Aqualyx are deoxycholic acid-based injections used to reduce stubborn fat areas. However, their working principles vary, and understanding the difference is crucial:
A major difference between Aqualyx and Kybella is their versatility and approved treatment zones. Typically, specialists choose the appropriate brand for the treatment based on this factor:
Both Aqualyx and Kybella are permanent products that help eliminate fat cells. However, their timelines and maintenance principles vary based on the target areas, the amount of fat, and some other key factors:
Adverse effects are natural for any cosmetic treatment, as it’s the body’s way of adjusting to the solution. Swelling, tenderness, and bruising are normal reactions and shouldn’t cause patients stress. However, Kybella tends to cause more severe and long-lasting adverse effects due to reducing unwanted fat in smaller areas.
Both Aqualyx and Kybella allow a quick return to daily activities and provide permanent destruction of fat cells eliminated by the body’s lymphatic system. Still, Aqualyx has a faster recovery period than Kybella.
Even though Aqualyx and Kybella differ in some ways, they are both effective for targeting fat cells in multiple body areas. They can deliver excellent results when used by skilled professionals who know their field by heart. Here are the key benefits of both brands that make them so highly demanded in the cosmetic beauty sphere:
Kybella provides quicker visible results in small, localized areas, such as the chin, while Aqualyx offers a more gradual fat reduction, making it suitable for larger or multiple treatment zones. Patients typically require between 2 to 8 sessions of Aqualyx spaced several weeks apart to achieve noticeable fat reduction, while Kybella may require 2 to 4 sessions for optimal results, depending on the area treated.
Patient satisfaction levels can vary, with many Aqualyx users reporting gradual improvements and less discomfort compared to Kybella, which is associated with more intense swelling and inflammation post-treatment.
Aqualyx and Kybella are injectable treatments for body contouring and fat reduction. They are effective, affordable, and safe, but there are some key differences specialists should know to pick the best solution according to patients’ aesthetic goals and body peculiarities.
Both Aqualyx and Kybella utilize deoxycholic acid to break down fat cells, but Aqualyx’s buffered formulation allows for a gentler approach, resulting in less discomfort and swelling compared to Kybella. Aqualyx is effective for treating localized fat deposits in various areas of the body, including the chin, abdomen, thighs, and hips, while Kybella is specifically FDA-approved for submental fat reduction under the chin.
We recommend both brands to our patients, as they have proven themselves to be safe and efficient throughout the years. Check out the availability on the FillerCloud website to purchase them for your clinic.
If you are treating larger fat deposits, Aqualyx is definitely a more affordable option, as Kybella prices can be up to twice as high per treatment session in some clinics. Everything depends on the supplier’s pricing, so check the costs to find the most suitable option for your needs and budget.
Kybella is FDA-approved in the U.S. specifically for treating submental fat, while Aqualyx is CE-marked in Europe but not FDA-approved. Many specialists use Aqualyx off-label in their medical practice because it’s a proven safe product for body contouring and fat reduction.
Yes, both products can be used for double-chin reduction; however, only one of them is FDA-approved for this procedure. While Kybella is approved specifically for the double chin, Aqualyx targets localized fat in both facial and body areas (especially in Europe).
Yes, fat cells destroyed by Aqualyx dissolve permanently. It is highly recommended to maintain a healthy lifestyle and a balanced diet to support the effect and keep one’s weight stable.
Initially, the results depend on the treatment’s goals and body peculiarities, as larger fat deposits need more time to be dissolved. Still, Aqualyx is believed to be slightly faster in terms of shrinkage and the effect’s overall duration.
Both Aqualyx and Kybella can cause localized mild swelling, tenderness, and bruising after injection, but Kybella typically results in more pronounced inflammation due to its higher concentration of deoxycholic acid. These treatments are not recommended for individuals who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or those with kidney or liver disease.
You may download the form, complete it and email back to [email protected].
Or fax it at 360.768.3126